Biscayne Lake Garden
Homes for Sale in Aventura, FL

BISCAYNE LAKE GDN BLDG A is one building within the broader Biscayne Lake Gardens condominium complex in Miami-Dade County, and the current MLS feed does not show active listings or identified community amenities for it as of this snapshot.

MIAMI REALTORS sales records identify 18 homes in BISCAYNE LAKE Garden that have changed hands since 2005, built between 1964 and 1969 (median 1964), with a median living area of about 800 sq ft and a typical 1-bedroom, 1-bath layout. Source: MIAMI REALTORS closed-sale history compiled by Momentum Research; counts reflect homes with a recorded MLS sale, not every home in the community.

Pre-construction details are compiled from public records, builder announcements and builder listings, and are subject to change without notice; figures are deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Momentum Research figures are our own analysis. This page describes homes, pricing and community attributes, not residents.

Biscayne Lake Garden is too small for its own price trend, so here is the market around it.

In ZIP 33180, 843 homes are on the market and 8% are under contract — a slower corner of Aventura.

Across Miami-Dade County, 15,314 homes are active and 3,367 pending (18% under contract).

In ZIP 33180, 577 homes closed in the last 12 months at a median of $485K ($342/sq ft), down 0.6% year over year, with a median 99 days on market. Right now 615 active and 55 pending listings put supply at about 4.3 months — a buyer's market. See the live ZIP 33180 housing market and the Miami-Dade County market.

ZIP and county figures describe the wider market, not Biscayne Lake Garden specifically. Momentum Research analysis of MLS records.

When a specific building shows no active listings and no amenities logged in the MLS, it usually means one of two things: turnover here is low, or recent activity has simply not been tagged distinctly to this building versus the wider complex. Either way, a buyer or seller working with this address should expect to lean on data from the parent community and nearby buildings rather than a self-contained sales history.

That does not make the building a bad target, it makes it one that requires more hands-on diligence: pulling condo association documents, checking unit-level history directly, and confirming what amenities the building or complex actually offers rather than relying on a listing description. This is a case where the paperwork does more work than the market stats.

When a building has no current listing trail, we do not guess, we go pull the association records, recent unit sales in the complex, and any rules or fee history that actually drive value here, so pricing and offer strategy are built on real documentation instead of a thin MLS snapshot.