Nirvana Condo No Three Co
Condos for Sale in Miami, FL

Nirvana Condo No Three sits in Miami-Dade County within a segment of the condo market where recent MLS closing activity has been sparse, so current pricing benchmarks are limited rather than statistically deep.

MIAMI REALTORS sales records identify 14 homes in NIRVANA Condo NO THREE CO that have changed hands since 2017, built between 1972 and 1972 (median 1972), with a median living area of about 926 sq ft and a typical 2-bedroom, 1-bath layout; 100% are condominiums. Source: MIAMI REALTORS closed-sale history compiled by Momentum Research; counts reflect homes with a recorded MLS sale, not every home in the community.

Pre-construction details are compiled from public records, builder announcements and builder listings, and are subject to change without notice; figures are deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Momentum Research figures are our own analysis. This page describes homes, pricing and community attributes, not residents.

Nirvana Condo No Three Co is too small for its own price trend, so here is the market around it.

In ZIP 33138, 216 homes are on the market and 15% are under contract — a slower corner of Miami.

Across Miami-Dade County, 15,109 homes are active and 3,290 pending (18% under contract).

In ZIP 33138, 218 homes closed in the last 12 months at a median of $821K ($536/sq ft), up 9.8% year over year, with a median 79 days on market. Right now 116 active and 27 pending listings — a buyer's market. See the live ZIP 33138 housing market and the Miami-Dade County market.

ZIP and county figures describe the wider market, not Nirvana Condo No Three Co specifically. Momentum Research analysis of MLS records.

The MLS record for this building currently shows minimal closing activity, and no community amenities have been identified from active or recent listings. That combination — light transaction volume and no documented amenity package on file — means most of what matters here (building condition, association health, unit-specific finishes) has to be verified directly rather than inferred from market-level statistics.

This is common in smaller or lower-turnover condo associations, where the absence of frequent sales is not necessarily a red flag but does mean buyers and sellers are pricing in a thinner information environment. Anyone transacting here should expect to do more direct diligence — condo docs, reserve status, recent special assessments if any — than they would in a building with a steady closing cadence.

In a building with this little recent closing data on record, the value of local representation shifts from reading a trend line to doing direct legwork: pulling the actual condo documents, confirming association financials, and pricing the specific unit on its own merits rather than a market average. That is the work we do before advising a number on either side of the transaction.

Confirm the current HOA dues, exactly what they cover, and any CDD bond or special assessment for a specific address before you offer.